Skip to content

Government belongs to the people.

If it governs your life, you should have a voice in it.

Official voting resourcesVote.gov ↗USA.gov ↗
Passed origin
745 total · sort: latest action
Showing 15 of 745Load 50 more →
119th Congress · H.R. 6506 · Passed Origin

Taxpayer Due Process Enhancement Act

This bill suspends the period of time allowed for claiming a federal tax refund (limitations period) during collection due process (CDP) proceedings, prohibits the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from applying tax overpayments to a tax liability that is disputed in such proceedings, and expands the Tax Court’s jurisdiction. As background, IRS collection actions and the underlying tax liability (in some circumstances) may be disputed in a CDP hearing. Collection actions are suspended during CDP proceedings, but the IRS may apply tax overpayments from other tax years to the disputed tax liability. The Tax Court may review an appeal of a CDP hearing determination. However, the Supreme Court held in Commissioner v. Zuch that the Tax Court loses jurisdiction over a CDP appeal if the CDP hearing determination is revoked because tax overpayments are applied to and fully satisfy the tax liability. In such circumstances, the taxpayer may claim a refund and seek redress in federal district court. Currently, the limitations period to file a refund claim is not suspended during CDP proceedings. The bill suspends the limitations period for claiming a tax refund during CDP proceedings (with exceptions), prohibits the IRS from applying tax overpayments to a properly disputed tax liability during CDP proceedings (unless waived or an exception applies), expands the Tax Court's jurisdiction in CDP cases to include jurisdiction over the underlying tax liability amount (if properly disputed), and provides that the Tax Court retains its jurisdiction if the IRS abandons collection actions.

0
Voices Recorded
L3 verified 0
L2 verified 0
Why three axes? · 50-second explainer

1 / 10
Now you know how it works.
Your true verified voice
Your Stance
Should this happen?
0%
0%
0%
Fiscal Judgment
Where do you stand on this government spending?
0%
0%
0%
Authority — Multiple can be selected
Which authority should have control over this? Mark all that apply.
0%
0%
0%
0%
SubjectsIncome tax creditsJurisdiction and venueSpecialized courtsTax administration and collection, taxpayers
Sponsor
Nathaniel Q. Moran, R-TX-1
2 terms · @RepNateMoran
1605 Longworth House Office Building Washington DC 20515-4301 · 202-225-3035
Cosponsors (1)
  • Terri A. Sewell, D-AL-7Original cosponsor
    Co-sponsored Dec 9, 2025 · 8 terms · @RepTerriSewell
Committees (2)
  • Finance Committee
    Senate Standing · Activity May 20, 2026
  • Ways and Means Committee
    House Standing · Activity Jan 7, 2026
Actions (15)
  1. May 20, 2026 · via Senate
    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
  2. May 19, 2026 · via House floor actions
    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  3. May 19, 2026 · via House floor actions
    On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3564)
  4. May 19, 2026 · via Library of Congress
    Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3564)
  5. May 19, 2026 · via House floor actions
    DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6506.
  6. May 19, 2026 · via House floor actions
    Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3564-3567)
  7. May 19, 2026 · via House floor actions
    Mr. Smith (MO) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
  8. Jan 7, 2026 · via House floor actions
    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 373.
  9. Jan 7, 2026 · via House floor actions
    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-428.
  10. Jan 7, 2026 · via Library of Congress
    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 119-428.
  11. Dec 10, 2025 · via House committee actions
    Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 0.
  12. Dec 10, 2025 · via House committee actions
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  13. Dec 9, 2025 · via House floor actions
    Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
  14. Dec 9, 2025 · via Library of Congress
    Introduced in House
  15. Dec 9, 2025 · via Library of Congress
    Introduced in House
IntroducedDec 9, 2025
Policy areaTaxation

Constitutional authority cited

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 207 (Tuesday, December 9, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. MORAN:H.R. 6506.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8[Page H5112]
⎔ Pre-anchorPermanent record — anchoring ships soonEpoch 2026-Q4