Skip to content

Government belongs to the people.

If it governs your life, you should have a voice in it.

Official voting resourcesVote.gov ↗USA.gov ↗
Passed origin
745 total · sort: latest action
Showing 15 of 745Load 50 more →
119th Congress · H.R. 2503 · Passed Origin

Undersea Cable Control Act

This bill requires the President and the Department of Commerce to take certain actions to prevent foreign adversaries from acquiring items needed to support the construction, maintenance, or operation of undersea cable projects. For the purposes of this bill, a foreign adversary is any foreign government or nongovernment person (entity or individual) engaged in certain conduct that significantly and adversely affects U.S. national security. Within one year of the bill's enactment, the President must seek to enter into agreements with allies and partners to prevent such items from being available to foreign adversaries. Furthermore, Commerce must determine the appropriate level of export and transfer controls for such items under the Export Administration Regulations. The bill also requires Commerce to develop a strategy to prevent such items from being available to foreign adversaries. The President must report annually to Congress on this strategy.

0
Voices Recorded
L3 verified 0
L2 verified 0
Why three axes? · 50-second explainer

1 / 10
Now you know how it works.
Your true verified voice
Your Stance
Should this happen?
0%
0%
0%
Fiscal Judgment
Where do you stand on this government spending?
0%
0%
0%
Authority — Multiple can be selected
Which authority should have control over this? Mark all that apply.
0%
0%
0%
0%
SubjectsAsiaBroadcasting, cable, digital technologiesChinaCongressional oversightLicensing and registrationsTechnology assessmentTechnology transfer and commercializationTrade restrictions
Sponsor
Thomas H. Kean Jr., R-NJ-7
2 terms · @CongressmanKean
251 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-3007 · 202-225-5361
Cosponsors (2)
  • Michael V. Lawler, R-NY-17
    Co-sponsored Apr 8, 2025 · 2 terms · @RepMikeLawler
  • Brad J. Sherman, D-CA-32
    Co-sponsored Apr 8, 2025 · 15 terms · @BradSherman
Committees (2)
  • Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
    Senate Standing · Activity Sep 3, 2025
  • Foreign Affairs Committee
    House Standing · Activity Apr 9, 2025
Actions (12)
  1. Sep 3, 2025 · via Senate
    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
  2. Sep 2, 2025 · via House floor actions
    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  3. Sep 2, 2025 · via House floor actions
    On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3733-3734)
  4. Sep 2, 2025 · via Library of Congress
    Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.
  5. Sep 2, 2025 · via House floor actions
    DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2503.
  6. Sep 2, 2025 · via House floor actions
    Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3733-3734)
  7. Sep 2, 2025 · via House floor actions
    Mr. Baumgartner moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
  8. Apr 9, 2025 · via House committee actions
    Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
  9. Apr 9, 2025 · via House committee actions
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
  10. Mar 31, 2025 · via House floor actions
    Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
  11. Mar 31, 2025 · via Library of Congress
    Introduced in House
  12. Mar 31, 2025 · via Library of Congress
    Introduced in House
IntroducedMar 31, 2025
Policy areaInternational Affairs

Constitutional authority cited

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 57 (Monday, March 31, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. KEAN:H.R. 2503.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8, clause 3, provides Congress with thepower to ``regulate commerce with foreign nations, and amongthe several states, and with the Indian tribes.'' The SupremeCourt has held that the ``power of Congress to promoteinterstate commerce also includes the power to regulate . . .local activities in both the States of origin anddestination, which might have a substantial and harmfuleffect upon that commerce,'' including local discriminatoryactivities that have a ``disruptive effect . . . oncommercial intercourse.'' See Heart of Atlanta Motel v.United States, 379 U.S. 241, 257-58 (1964).[Page H1375]
⎔ Pre-anchorPermanent record — anchoring ships soonEpoch 2026-Q4