Skip to content

Government belongs to the people.

If it governs your life, you should have a voice in it.

Official voting resourcesVote.gov ↗USA.gov ↗
Final outcomes
266 total · sort: latest action
Showing 15 of 266Load 50 more →
119th Congress · H.J.Res. 142 · Final

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the D.C. Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025.

This joint resolution reinstates provisions of District of Columbia (DC) tax law to conform with federal tax law. As background, DC generally automatically adopts changes to federal tax law (known as rolling conformity). Therefore, upon enactment of the 2025 reconciliation act (commonly known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act), many of its tax provisions became DC law. DC subsequently enacted its own legislation (the DC Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025) that decoupled DC tax law from these federal provisions. This joint resolution nullifies the DC legislation, thereby generally realigning DC tax law with the tax provisions of the 2025 reconciliation act. Specifically, the joint resolution reinstates for DC provisions that • increase the higher basic standard deduction; • increase deductible charitable cash contributions (for taxpayers who take the standard deduction); • establish a $6,000 tax deduction for taxpayers 65 years and older; • allow a tax deduction of qualified tips, qualified overtime pay, and qualified car loan interest; • authorize an elective 100% depreciation allowance for nonresidential real property; and • authorize businesses to deduct 100% of research and experimental costs retroactive to tax year 2022. The DC legislation also amended several other provisions of DC tax law, including restoring the DC child tax credit. The joint resolution negates these changes.

0
Voices Recorded
L3 verified 0
L2 verified 0
Why three axes? · 50-second explainer

1 / 10
Now you know how it works.
Your true verified voice
Your Stance
Should this happen?
0%
0%
0%
Fiscal Judgment
Where do you stand on this government spending?
0%
0%
0%
Authority — Multiple can be selected
Which authority should have control over this? Mark all that apply.
0%
0%
0%
0%
SubjectsDistrict of ColumbiaIncome tax deductionsState and local financeState and local government operationsTax administration and collection, taxpayersWages and earnings
Sponsor
Brandon G. Gill, R-TX-26
1 term · @repbrandongill
1305 Longworth House Office Building Washington DC 20515-4326 · 202-225-7772
Cosponsors (1)
  • W. G. Steube, R-FL-17
    Co-sponsored Feb 2, 2026 · 4 terms · @RepGregSteube
Committees (1)
  • Oversight and Government Reform Committee
    House Standing · Activity Jan 22, 2026
Actions (25)
  1. Feb 18, 2026 · via Library of Congress
    Became Public Law No: 119-78.
  2. Feb 18, 2026 · via Library of Congress
    Became Public Law No: 119-78.
  3. Feb 18, 2026 · via Library of Congress
    Signed by President.
  4. Feb 18, 2026 · via Library of Congress
    Signed by President.
  5. Feb 12, 2026 · via House floor actions
    Presented to President.
  6. Feb 12, 2026 · via Library of Congress
    Presented to President.
  7. Feb 12, 2026 · via Senate
    Message on Senate action sent to the House.
  8. Feb 12, 2026 · via Senate
    Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 47. Record Vote Number: 37.
  9. Feb 12, 2026 · via Library of Congress
    Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 47. Record Vote Number: 37.
  10. Feb 12, 2026 · via Senate
    Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S587-593)
  11. Feb 11, 2026 · via Senate
    Measure laid before Senate by motion.
  12. Feb 11, 2026 · via Senate
    Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 46. Record Vote Number: 36. (CR S571)
  13. Feb 5, 2026 · via Senate
    Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 315.
  14. Feb 4, 2026 · via House floor actions
    On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 215 - 210 (Roll no. 56). (text: CR H2002)
  15. Feb 4, 2026 · via Library of Congress
    Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 215 - 210 (Roll no. 56). (text: CR H2002)
  16. Feb 4, 2026 · via House floor actions
    Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2010-2011)
  17. Feb 4, 2026 · via House floor actions
    POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.J. Res. 142, the Chair put the question on passage of the joint resolution and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Frost demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  18. Feb 4, 2026 · via House floor actions
    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  19. Feb 4, 2026 · via House floor actions
    DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 142.
  20. Feb 4, 2026 · via House floor actions
    Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 142 and H.R. 4090. The resolution provides for consideration of the Senate amendments to H.R. 7148. Also, the resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 142 and H.R. 4090 under a closed rule and provides for one motion to recommit H.R. 4090.
  21. Feb 4, 2026 · via House floor actions
    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1032. (consideration: CR H2002-2008)
  22. Feb 3, 2026 · via House floor actions
    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1032 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 142 and H.R. 4090. The resolution provides for consideration of the Senate amendments to H.R. 7148. Also, the resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 142 and H.R. 4090 under a closed rule and provides for one motion to recommit H.R. 4090.
  23. Jan 22, 2026 · via House floor actions
    Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
  24. Jan 22, 2026 · via Library of Congress
    Introduced in House
  25. Jan 22, 2026 · via Library of Congress
    Introduced in House
IntroducedJan 22, 2026
Policy areaGovernment Operations and Politics

Constitutional authority cited

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 15 (Thursday, January 22, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. GILL of Texas:H.J. Res. 142.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8[Page H1351]
⎔ AnchoredPride costs us more than hunger, thirst, and cold.Epoch 2026-Q4